Let Readers Read: An Open Letter to the Publishers in Hachette v. Internet Archive
Author Archives: Ali Reza Hayati
Make free software normal
Using computer programs such as VLC media player is very normal. Millions of people use it daily without ever thinking it’s a weird tool or player or even thinking what’s behind it. It’s one of the best media players we could ask for and is published under a GNU General Public License.
The quality of the media player is so high, people just install and use it. Unfortunately, the qualities and features of many other free (as in freedom) programs are not considered when people choose their software. Windows, the malicious freedom and privacy-violating operating system from Microsoft, is the dominant OS on personal computers and Android filled with proprietary programs and components is the dominant OS on mobile phones.
The quality of GNU operating system with Linux kernel is very high. The features, the freedom, the usability, the community, and many other factors to consider are all voting that GNU should be the normal operating system when people try to choose. However, the publicity of Microsoft and the resources, power, and tools it has made it the dominant OS.
Even though Microsoft violates users’ privacy and freedom everyday, in bright daylight, it is still one of the main two default choices people consider, along with other proprietary malicious operating system published by Apple.
It is like this because people consider it the normal. No matter how wrong it is, people choose it because it’s the normal way of computing for people. We, the free software community, should change that.
We should change the normal way of computing by educating people that using a computer should not be equal to losing your privacy. We should teach people that using a computer is not equal to losing your freedom. We should teach them that a computer should do as the user wishes, not vice versa. It is the computer that should be under the person’s command, and it should be the normal.
The normal should be:
- Users can run programs as they wish, for any purpose.
- Users are free to study how the programs work, and be able to change it so it does what the user wants.
- Users be free to redistribute copies of the program.
- Users be free to redistribute the copies of their modified versions.
And it is what computer user freedom means. It is what should be the normal for people. It is not only about the GNU operating system (or as many may may call it, Linux — which is a kernel), it’s every piece of program a computer user runs. Freedom is not conditional is situational. One should always be free from proprietary software.
It’s like free speech. It’s not that we always have something to say, it’s that we always should be free to speak. Computer user freedom, or software freedom, is not about always changing everything, it’s about having the right and power to change what we believe is wrong or is not suitable for us.
Computer user freedom is not the normal we have today. Running GNU+Linux on your computer is still odd for many people, and we should change that. People already use a lot of free (as in freedom) programs daily. VLC media player is one of them. Many proprietary programs use free components.
And it’s not like you have to be a computer expert to be able to use a free operating system or program, believe me, I know so many people who use them daily with no problem and they’re not even a computer power user.
We should change the normal. It shouldn’t be normal to sacrifice your privacy and freedom to be able to use your computer and we can achieve the new normal, the correct, humane, people-focused, and right normal through education, good publicity, hard work on usability and user experience (UX), and consistent work on improving our user interfaces and adopting them for daily users.
It’s never late to start, specially for a good purpose like our mission.
450 thousand-year-old tooth found in Iran
Link
Too much personal information online
One thing that bothered me, regarding some bloggers I follow, is that people are sharing too much personal information online. I understand that this may be a personal matter and I have no right or power to control what is being published by others or how they choose to respect their own privacy, yet it bothered me.
I don’t know if they do this knowingly but some people share too much of their personal information. I do it too. My recent post about watching Godzilla movies is an example of unnecessary personal information on internet.
Why do we do it? I think because it’s fun and we have an urge to socialize through tools we have. I don’t use social networks and I feel I satisfy my need of socialization with posting such personal data in hope of forming connection to other people. I don’t know how correct that is.
Anyway, that feels unhealthy. As one who cares about privacy, I find it very upsetting that we voluntarily share such information. However, this is a personal blog, the blogs I read are also mostly personal. Everything we do and everything we say is personal so isn’t every post somehow sharing personal information?
Isn’t every service we sign up for, every mailing list we join, every blog we subscribe to, every video we watch and every message we send a piece of our personal information and data we share with others?
Internet is not safe and I understand this a bit more and better every and each day. If we’re connected to internet, at least a bit of our personal data is being shared with others whether we like it or not. I was thinking that some people are careless about what they share online on their personal blogs and homes, then I realized I do it as well, and came to understanding that we all do it no matter how much we care.
We share our information because internet is built that way. It starts when we connect to internet and share our IP and some other information with ISPs and ends when we enter our identifier into a form to get something in return.
So maybe writing about what I watch online or what that random guy wears or where were we last Sunday is the least of our worry and we should focus on broader and wider violation of our privacy both online and offline. At least what we write on our blogs are voluntary sharing of information, and not done by some mega corporation to make benefit upon our personal lives.
To do that, of course, we should start using free software and privacy-focused services. We should avoid proprietary programs, which they almost always spy on us, and change our privacy practices. We should start respecting ourselves more, and start to understand that our data is valuable, enough that corporations are willing to pay billions of dollars to get it.
I thought I share too much personal information online, but that’s not the case. My privacy gets more violated by those who collect my personal information without my real consent. They are willing to pay billions of dollars in fines rather than to stop it (example, example, example, example), that’s how valuable our data is.
We should stop this. Governments won’t do enough, as they benefit from these privacy violations, so the real change will be done by people. It’s people, and those who care enough to change, that will change how we’re treated. Nobody cares enough about online privacy except us, who are victims of violations.
If Mark Zuckerberg, who is one of biggest violators of people’s privacy, cares so much that he refuses to share his own personal data, we should refuse it too. If privacy is so much important than people who run these mega privacy-violating corporations value it, then we should value it as well.
I am deeply worried about how our personal information is handled. It’s not just a matter of advertisement, but it’s a matter of freedom. The first step to remain free, from bad people both online and offline, is to care about our privacy. Liberty is so much more valuable than anything else, and I believe people know and understand that, yet we don’t have the prerequisite of it, which is to be able to be private.
Privacy is needed so we can practice our rights, such as freedom of speech. Without privacy, and without protection from the violators, we are doomed to lose everything we have, everything our fathers fought for, the most important of which to be our liberty and freedom.
So use free software, use freedom and privacy-respecting programs and services, and know the value of your information so you can respect yourself more and better.
Fireballs
There are not many people in the world who have had the amazing experience of seeing such a beautiful fireball, let alone to record it.
This girl accidentally recorded a fireball passing, in Portugal. The other two videos were sent to me, originally downloaded from a Telegram channel.
Lot of Godzilla for one day
Aside
I started Friday by watching “Godzilla Minus One” and finished it watching “Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire” and they were exciting.
I’m glad I watched both of them in one day, it was a day full of Godzillas and the movies were actually quite different. Even though they both were about titans and monsters, they followed different stories and had different depictions of the monsters.
It was fun overall. I had some rest, some movies, and cleared my mind.
We should care more about our children’s mental health
I was reading about Brown v. Board of Education and there’s an interesting paragraph:
To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone. The effect of this separation on their educational opportunities was well stated by a finding in the Kansas case by a court which nevertheless felt compelled to rule against the Negro plaintiffs
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+)
Argued December 9, 1952
Reargued December 8, 1953
Decided May 17, 1954
The court ruled in favor of Oliver Brown (or to better put it, racial integration) partly because of the psychological impact on children. This is something we don’t consider much lately. There is physical harm and there is psychological and mental harm. When we treat our children and when we decide what’s good or bad, we mostly consider the physical harm, yet the mental impacts of our decisions may have a way more influence on our kids.
A child living in a household full of mental pressures is in risk of being damaged. A child living in poverty may take physical harm but there is also mental harm. The child would be in constant pressure and may feel less worthy, wronged, and unequal to others.
When we put children in an environment full of pressure to decide their genders or when unnecessarily give too much information about sex and gender, we’re putting harm on our children. I’m not against trans people, I have dear trans friends who have faced real issues in their lives and had to combat many troubles because of their bodies, and I understand their pain and fully support them but I still can’t agree that minors should be able to decide to physically harm their body or mutilate themselves.
Yet, the physical part may be possible to be undone but the mental damage they suffer from may never heal. They may overcome their physical pain but the damage done to their minds is permanent.
It’s wrong to let children decide if they’re a man or woman. If they’re too young to vote or drink alcohol or live by themselves, then they’re too young to decide to change their sex or decide what gender they’re in.
I think there’s only two sexes. You’re either a man or a woman. I also think that there are people who have been born in a wrong body. I think it should be legal to help those people change their identity and help them become what they truly are. It’s a human right and people should be able to enjoy their freedom to decide.
I’m not a doctor and I never studied biology, that being said, I think five thousand years from now if some alien people find our remaining, and they decide to categorize us, they would categorize us not in 10 genders but in two. They would put us either in the male section or female section. That’s my opinion and it may be wrong.
I believe we shouldn’t bring drag queens to schools and we certainly shouldn’t bring children to drag races. The same way we restrict pornography or R-rated movies, or are cautioned when it’s a PG-13 show, we should be cautioned about how we treat our children when it comes to sexuality.
And I don’t mean it’s only trans stuff that are harmful. When we surround our children with what is not suitable for their age, we’re doing harm to them. There’s also opposite of that. If we teach them that their sexual orientation should only align with what we believe, we’re doing harm to them. If we force them to repeat our belief, we’re doing harm to them.
I believe we should consider punishing those who put our children in danger and this danger is not only physical, but also mental. I believe we should take more care of our future generation.
I’m not a conservative, I frequently mock them and I disagree with most of their ideologies but I got to support them on this one. Well not completely, they’ve gone too far. I don’t support banning a book because it mentioned “gay”, or shutting down libraries because some dumb lady thinks her kid is reading Playboy magazines there, but I believe when it comes to sexuality, we should be a lot more careful.
I also don’t mean we should stop every sex education we have in schools, we certainly need them and I think we should even expand them to be more effective, but I also think that people like Kayla Lemieux should not be allowed in schools. I think we should normalize that people may have different sexual orientation and preference but it should be done when the child is in proper age.
In any situation, when we treat our kids in a way that we deprive them of the power of free will and thinking, we’re doing harm to them and it should be stopped immediately. It’s not that we may force children to do something but it’s that when we constantly repeat a certain thought to our children, we automatically induce them to follow that thought.
There’s a proper age for everything. If we don’t cell cigarettes to people unless they’re above a certain age, because it may harm their bodies, then we shouldn’t cell them certain information that may harm their minds. If we don’t let them sign hospital papers for surgeries such as appendectomy, then they certainly shouldn’t be able to decide for changing their sex.
And it’s not just sex. The sex thing was on top of my head. There are a lot of stuff happening. We surround our children with guns. A weapon to kill people should not be something normal in a household. I’m all for people’s rights to “bear Arms” but it shouldn’t be normal. We shouldn’t make it easy for our children to shoot a gun. We should teach them when they grow up, as the United States Constitution mentions it’s “being necessary to the security of a free State”, but that shouldn’t be normal for a child.
Technology can be lot harmful to children. Unsupervised use of internet is a lot harmful to our children. Internet material is not well-regulated, nor it should be, but children’s use of web and internet should be supervised and controlled by parents.
And hey, let me say this too, it’s not that children are in constant danger. They usually can think for themselves and decide correctly. No matter how much we restrict them, they can find a way to access material we forbade. It’s not much we can do. I know some minors who are active members of software communities and they’re really good programmers. They chose to use internet for something amazing and they’re learning a lot. That’s awesome. I bet if we restricted their internet, they wouldn’t learn as much as they have.
My point is that restriction is not the sole solution. Education is equally important. We should not treat our children as they don’t understand anything, we should treat them in a way that they can decide for themselves correctly and wisely. We should care about their mentality, and teach them how to decide and tell right and wrong. We should let them make mistakes yet protect them from the worst consequences.
We should let them take a controlled amount of harm so they can learn. If they don’t ever get punished, or face some consequences, then we have hurt them in another way. It’s like our body’s immune system. If it never contacts any virus or bacteria, then it will remain weak.
We should protect our children both physically and mentally. We should care a lot more about them and it should be done through a combination of controlled access to information, good education, and give them a say in their life, choices, and future.
Oh, am I legally bound to say these are just random opinions and I’m not an expert of psychology or children matters?
Domain change
Aside
You probably didn’t notice it because the previous domain is now forwarding to this one but the domain of this blog is changed and you’re now connected to the new address.
Everything is working fine as far as I know and the previous domain is set to be redirected to the new one. All the previous links will forever work. I’m not planning on deleting that domain, in fact, I’m planning on keep using it for many years.
I moved to this domain because it’s shorter, easier to remember, and more aligned and suitable for this blog. I’m gonna update my links wherever I posted them and I’m gonna ask you, if you linked to me, to update them as well. Again, previous links will work forever but it’s nice if you could update them.
The domain change will be a disaster SEO-wise but I needed to do it sooner or later. I hope everything will get back to normal soon. This blog has been online for about four years now and this can be a new start for it.
Cheers.
Update: I didn’t think changing a domain would be this hard. Still no regrets though.
The Rise and Fall of .Ly
Link
The state of AI
Aside
Putting aside all the privacy and users’ rights violations by AI companies, the state of AI today is fascinating. We’re living in a world full of amazing advancements in tech and life. The fact that AI can now help blind people get through everyday life, or talk to you about your plans for the day, or summarize texts with sufficient quality is beyond everything we thought we’re getting few years ago. There’s no doubt that AI is going to make our lives easier. Only matter is how humane will it be, both in matters of online and offline human rights.
Bonus: OpenAI introduces GPT-4o (YouTube Link)