In 1969, Leila Khaled hijacked her first airliner, commandeering TWA flight 870 and becoming the first woman to hijack an airplane. The hijacking was undertaken in support of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, an organization designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. Department of State in 1997.

Today, a half century later, two faculty members at San Francisco State University had planned to host — via Zoom — a “roundtable conversation” and “Q&A discussion” with Khaled, described as a “Palestinian feminist, militant, and leader.” Critics of the event, however, argued that the discussion would be unlawful, even criminal. The planned discussion was condemned by dozens of pro-Israel organizations, including the Zionist Organization of America, which urged that the “program be cancelled immediately, since a violent terrorist has nothing of value to offer your students.”

Yesterday, Zoom refused to allow the university to use its service for the discussion — a cancellation praised by FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr, who said there was no “need to hear both sides.” It is not yet clear whether the organizers of the event will switch to another channel of communication.

Source: FIRE

Yesterday, Reps. Tulsi Gabbard and Thomas Massie introduced H.R.8336, the Unplug the Internet Kill Switch Prevention Act, which would prevent the President from using emergency powers to cut off America’s access to the internet and undermine Americans’ Constitutional protections.

The bipartisan, bicameral bill was introduced in the Senate by Sens. Rand Paul, Ron Wyden, and Gary Peters. “The oath that I took as a Soldier and as a Member of Congress was to support and defend our Constitution. The freedoms enshrined in our Constitution cannot be taken for granted. Our legislation would fix a WWII-era law that gives the president nearly unchallenged authority to restrict access to the internet, conduct email surveillance, control computer systems and cell phones.

No President should have the power to ignore our freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution and violate our civil liberties and privacy by declaring a national emergency,” said Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.

“When governments around the world turn off internet access, they do significant harm to their national economies and their citizen’s civil rights,” said Rep. Thomas Massie. “This bipartisan bill will ensure that no future American president can unilaterally trip an ‘internet kill switch.’ Americans do not have to accept the premise that one person can deprive them of their 1st Amendment rights by flipping a switch.”

File: UnplugtheInternetKillSwitchActof2020.pdf

The London pan-Arab daily al-Quds al-Arabi (Arab Jerusalem) reports that the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, voted down a proposed basic law introduced by Yousef Jabareen on behalf of the Joint List. It aimed at altering the constitutional basis of the Israeli state, requiring democratic principles, cultural pluralism, and complete equality for all citizen on both civil and national levels.

During the past year, the Knesset has shot down numerous proposals to amend the National Law to forbid discrimination against non-Jews.

What follows is a paraphrase of the article with a few comments by me. One comment by me to begin with: Israel has all along had a choice between being a democratic state for all its citizens or being an ethno-nationalist oligarchy with second-class citizens at home and Apartheid subjects in the West Bank. This is not the first Knesset vote to demonstrate forcefully that the Israeli majority wants the latter.

The bill aimed at providing existential and democratic human rights, especially complete equality and the recognition of the Palestinian-Israeli ethnic identity. Israelis of Palestinian heritage comprise about 21% of Israel’s citizen population.

The Knesset roundly rejected the bill, with both the Likud-led far-right coalition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Blue and White bloc of his foreign minister and sometime rival, Benny Gantz, voting against it.

Amnesty International called for an end to the death sentence and a fair retrial for Heydar Ghorbani, a political prisoner sentenced to death in Sanandaj prison, Iran.

Noting that Heydar Ghorbani is in danger of being executed, Amnesty International wrote intelligence, prosecution, and judicial authorities have severely violated the principles of a fair trial in his case and the court cites confessions that are not true. Amnesty International also wrote that Heydar was confessed under torture and he had no lawyer.

Recently, the Supreme Court rejected the request for a retrial of Heydar. Mr. Ghorbani had previously been sentenced to death by the Sanandaj Revolutionary Court on charges of “violation of the rights of others,” and the sentence was upheld by the Supreme Court in August.

More than 31 million people are now infected by coronavirus in which more than 950 thousand people are dead. Stats are rising constantly and in just few days (or weeks), the number victims will reach to 1 million.

Till now (this post), near 21.5 million people are recovered and United States, India, Brazil, and Russia are countries with more cases.

Please wash your hands regularly, use hand sanitizer whenever you touch anything, wash you clothes whenever you go back home, wear mask and gloves, and keep your distance (at least 2 meters). Don’t listen to people who don’t take the virus seriously and don’t listen to anyone who claims to have a treat. There are no vaccines yet.

Also, there are some anti-vaxxers protesting against using a vaccine, keep your distance from them and never speak to them. If they were forcing their children to avoid medical treatment, call your local social services station.

Please take this seriously. It is a deadly virus that nobody is immune to it. Even previously infected people can get sick again. Take it seriously so we all can survive. Don’t break the quarantine and follow the doctors’ advises.

According to the London-based Iran International, the three minors — Hadi Rostami, Mehdi Sharafian and Mehdi Shahivand — lost their appeals in the Iranian Supreme Court this week and were subsequently ordered to have four fingers severed from their right hands. The boys were initially tried last November on charges of four counts of robbery in the northern city of Urmia and have remained behind bars ever since.

It is unclear when the judicial measure will be carried out, and authorities have not issued any further details about the extent or nature of their crimes. However, the Judiciary Media Center denied the news about the execution of the sentence of amputating the fingers of three children for theft.

It is not clear from this text that only their childhood was denied or that the execution order was denied. In any case, the sentence issued cannot be denied because the defendants were notified in 2019 and the news today was that the sentence was sent for execution of the sentence.

A June report released by the Iran Human Rights Monitor (IRM) underscored that Rostami, Sharafian and Shahivand claimed that they were forced to confess under torture, and one of the prisoners — Rostami — was in a dire health condition in the Central Prison of Urmia and had cut his wrists in protest of the upholding of his sentence earlier this year.

According to statistics collected by the Boroumand Foundation over the years, at least 174 amputations of the hand/finger have been carried out in the last 29 years in Iran. Undoubtedly, this statistic does not include all cases of execution of this sentence because many of these sentences are not officially announced and the actual amount of execution is more than this number.

Victims of hand/finger amputation punishments face many problems in life, and this sentence is extremely unjust, inhuman and inaccurate. Such punishments must be stopped because there is no justice in them and this act is very inhumane and contrary to human rights.

Sadly, the number rises when we collect data from other countries such as Saudi Arabia, which has a terrible situation and place when in comes to respecting humans and human rights.

While ago, Navid Afkari, an Iranian held in prison with death sentence accused of murder, got executed which many human rights and social activists believe the death sentence for murder was unfair and he was executed with no evidence.

Now, two of his brothers are still in prison with charges of assisting in murder. In a released voice recording of Navid, he told that he and his brothers were tortured a lot and forced to confess against each other. Now, social activists are concerned that the two other brothers face an end similar to their executed brother.

There was no evidence shown to public that proves the guilt of Afkari brothers. The only evidence was their own confession which they claim was under torture and in this case, the confession is worthless. Torture is inhumane and execution is against human rights.

I believe the killer should be punished but with a proper humanly punishment not execution. Whoever killed the murdered person in this case, or assisted in the murder, should be arrested and punished with no doubt but the arrest should be with proper evidence and there shouldn’t be any death sentence, not in this case nor any other. No person should lose its life because of past mistakes.